Pro-Life Equals Pro-Democracy
Learn the “Top 6 Facts” of Human Rights History (Plus the Science and Logic) Which Prove Pro-Life = Pro-Democracy (and Pro-Choice = Pro-Totalitarianism)
by
Book Cover & Preview Text
Officially “Pro-Choice” Governing Political Parties Worldwide (backed by a “Pro-Choice Abortion” UN) are Starting to Pass Totalitarian Laws and Policies Restricting the Free Speech of Pro-Life Human Rights Advocates, Because There is No Other Way the Pro-Choice Side Can Ultimately Prevail than By Ending Democratic Freedoms, Since All the Most Pertinent Facts of Human Rights History, Science and Logic Support the “Pro-Life” Position and the Conclusion that Pro-Life = Pro-Democracy (and Pro-Choice = Pro-Totalitarianism), As Shown in This Book . . .
Fact 1: “Pro-Choice Abortion” Philosophy and the Parental “Right to Choose” to Raise or Abort One’s Child are Not New but Ancient, Part of the Brutal Ancient Mindset Where Human Life was Cheap Not Precious, Before There Were Any Legally Recognized Human Rights . . .
Fact 2: Human Rights Were First Legally Recognized in 318 AD with the Criminalization of Abortion (and Infanticide) Because Human Life Then Started to Be Recognized as Precious Not Cheap (and therefore Killing Humans is Wrong) . . .
Fact 3: Precious Human Life Was Protected by Law or Custom Right from its Beginning in the Womb from the 4th Century to the 20th Century (During Which Time Modern Human Rights and Democratic Freedoms Gradually but Logically Developed from the Foundational Principle That Every Human Life is Equally Precious, Which is WHY Each Human Deserves an Equal Say or Vote), Until the First Two Modern Nations to De-Criminalize Abortion Were Soviet Russia (in 1920) and Nazi Germany (in 1934) – Totalitarian States Threatening the Lives and Freedoms of Citizens Just Like Those Back When Legal Abortion was the Ancient Norm . . .
Fact 4: Three important things happened in 1948 specifically intending to make sure nothing like the de-humanizing Nazi atrocities that denied Human Rights to some humans ever threatened Democracy and Human Rights again: 1) The Nuremberg War Crimes Trials condemned the Nazis for Legal Abortion they encouraged mothers to ask for, describing Legal Abortion as “an inhumane act,” an “act of extermination” and a “crime against humanity” because 2) (as the newly-formed UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights declared the same year) Human Rights are for ALL humans “without distinction of any kind” because “recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of ALL members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.” 3) The 1948 Declaration of Geneva, in response to the Nazis de-criminalizing both human-killing abortion and human-killing euthanasia in violation of the 2500-year Hippocratic Medical Tradition that doctors do not kill patients, similarly reaffirmed the Hippocratic Oath Tradition in the doctor’s promise, “I will maintain the utmost respect for human life, from the time of conception; even under threat, I will not use my medical knowledge contrary to the laws of humanity.” In 1948 the West knew killing humans is wrong (and that Doctors Do Not Kill Patients) because humans have inherent Human Rights, and at Nuremberg realized everyone has a human responsibility to recognize those rights in other humans or else totalitarianism and atrocities happen . . .
Fact 5: As any thinking person would totally expect once knowing the above facts, of course the “Free West,” since following the Totalitarian Soviet and Nazi precedent of de-criminalizing the abortion-killing of preborn humans (thereby cancelling out the legally recognized Inherent Human Right to Live which is the foundation of all Human Rights and Freedoms), has in fact introduced “Creeping Totalitarianism” into Western democracies, gradually but logically undermining Human Rights and Democratic Freedoms and making Western democracies gradually take on more and more characteristics of Totalitarian States . . .
Fact 6: Legal Abortion (with its profitable Abortion Industry) is every bit as fundamentally incompatible with Democracy as Legal Slavery (with its profitable Slave Trade) was, for precisely the same reason: Both (like the Nazis) deny human rights to some humans (making “Human Rights” meaningless if not all humans have them) and both violate the same traditional Foundational Principle of Human Rights and Democracy that every human life without exception is EQUAL and PRECIOUS, which is the underlying reason Western governments stopped being oppressive and totalitarian, ended slavery and eventually gave every human a vote or democratic say in his or her own governance, in the first place. Legal Abortion needs to be abolished for precisely the same reason Legal Slavery did. It is fundamentally anti-human and anti-democratic . . .
Scientifically Speaking: Every Human Life is the Same Unique Living Individual Biological Human Organism with Absolutely Unique Human DNA Utterly Distinct from His or Her Parents at Every Age and Stage of His or Her Human Life-cycle (zygote to senior adult) . . .
Furthermore: The Formal Science of Logic Identifies this Perfectly Sound Logical Syllogism: All Humans Have Human Rights. Preborn Humans are Humans. Therefore, Preborn Humans Have Human Rights . . .
ALL Pro-Choice Abortion Arguments are Intellectually Dishonest Uses of What the Science of Logic Calls Fallacies of Distraction . . .
More Accurate Terms to Clarify the Essence of the Central Dispute of Our Time: Where Do You Stand on the Current Human Rights for All Humans Debate? Do you believe in Equal Human Rights for All Humans, or do you believe Human Rights can and should be denied to some humans (as with slavery, Death Camps, human-killing abortion and human-killing euthanasia)? That is, are you ‘Pro-Human-Right-to-Live’ or ‘Pro-Choice-to-Kill-Humans’? Are you a ‘Pro-Life Human Rights Advocate’ or are you a ‘Pro-Choice Bigot’ who (like all bigots) CHOOSES just WHICH humans you accept as humans with equal human value and rights and WHICH humans you do NOT value equally? These more accurate terms leave less room for the Pro-Choice(-to-Kill-Humans) side’s intellectually dishonest tendency to be illogical and unscientific and pretend that humans are not killed in abortions . . .
Human Rights Education is the Antidote to Current Worldwide ‘Creeping Totalitarianism’ . . .
Western Civilization is at a Critical “Tipping Point” That Threatens Democracy . . .
Pro-Choice Politicians and Political Parties are Neither Qualified Nor Competent to Lead a LASTING Democracy . . . Democracies Which Want to LAST Must Constitutionally Enshrine Some Form of the Pro-Life Foundational Principles of Human Rights and Democracy . . .
When judged according to the objective standards of Science and Logic - and undisputed facts of Human Rights History – The Pro-Choice position for legal abortion is revealed as not even remotely intellectually defensible, and not even remotely acceptable in a LASTING democracy, which can only last on Democracy's historic Pro-life foundations.
Formats
Book Details
About the Book
In a kind of “Sequel” to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago (quoted throughout), with Solzhenitsyn’s intellect, honesty and intense passion for speaking Truth William Baptiste unravels 380 years of bad philosophy that has resulted in Marxism, anti-scientific Postmodernism developed by Marxists to protect Marxism from facts, and current Neo-Marxist Identity Politics which foments racial hatred, which all frequently accompany legal human-killing abortion, which was first legalized 100 Years ago in 1920 Marxist Soviet Russia as a prelude to legalizing the genocide of millions of William’s ethnic heritage. Lincoln said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand . . . it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.” The divisive fundamental incompatibility between democracy built on Equal Human Rights and legal slavery/legal abortion which both deny Equal Human Rights to all humans will incessantly scream for resolution, and in the end we will have to keep democracy and lose legal abortion (as we lost legal slavery), or else keep legal abortion and lose democracy.
Jordan Peterson’s fellow Canadian intellectual, non-partisan thinker & logician William Baptiste, is fed up with Pro-Choice ‘Creeping Totalitarianism’ taking away normal democratic freedoms of speech, expression, assembly, conscience & religion of Pro-Life Human Rights Advocates, including real doctors who follow the 2500-year Hippocratic Medical Tradition that doctors don’t kill.
Officially Pro-Choice political parties in his country and others keep asininely insisting the Abortion Debate (the Human Rights for All Humans Debate) is “settled” in their favor, all while they pass totalitarian laws making peaceful Pro-Life Human Rights Advocacy a crime in order to silence the Free Speech of Pro-Lifers. All because Pro-Choice politicians simply cannot win a respectful, intellectually honest, intelligent, rational, scientific and rigorously logical debate about abortion. Abortion which was first legalized by the evil Soviets & Nazis specifically because neither believed that killing humans is wrong.
A proper, intelligent and intellectually honest Human-Rights-educated Abortion Debate (Human Rights for All Humans Debate) has never occurred, neither in the author’s country nor anywhere else. Pro-Life Equals Pro-Democracy is William Baptiste’s initial contribution to an honest, intelligent dialogue which actually considers and does not ignore established facts of Human Rights History and Biological Science; a dialogue which is conducted honestly according to sound logic, avoiding the logical fallacies of the intellectually dishonest (which include every single argument typically proposed for legal abortion).
Pro-Life Equals Pro-Democracy with its Intellectual Honesty Challenge intends to both ACTUALLY START and SUCCESSFULLY END the Human Rights for All Humans Debate (the Abortion Debate) Once and For All; and Proclaims THE THINKING REVOLUTION to Protect Free Democracy For Centuries.
When judged according to the objective standards of Science and Logic - and undisputed facts of Human Rights History - the Pro-Choice position for legal abortion is revealed as not even remotely intellectually defensible, and not even remotely acceptable in a LASTING democracy, which can only last on Democracy’s historic Pro-Life foundations. As Solzhenitsyn challenged the genocidal Marxist Soviet Communist Party, William Baptiste challenges every Pro-Choice Political Party which follows their legal human-killing abortion precedent to account for themselves before the public and repent of their totalitarian legal human-killing abortion evil – as intellectual honesty demands.
WilliamBaptisteHumanRightsAndFreedomsForever.com
About the Author
Before his Ph.D. studies at the Sheptytsky Institute and being a professor at Dominican University College (where he replaced Dr. Andrew Bennett, appointed Canada’s Ambassador of Religious Freedom), William Baptiste got his Master’s Degree with Honors at Franciscan University of Steubenville (FUS), where the Philosophy Chair testified in writing to the University President of “his tremendous academic talent” and “considerable power of mind;” a genius IQ which he has since used to discern and lay out clearly from the tangled webs of historical details the “golden threads” woven throughout history that give us all our Human Rights and democratic freedoms. At FUS, the famous Dr. Scott Hahn wrote William’s work was “outstanding,” “excellent,” “clear, thoughtful and thorough,” and the Theology Chair Dr. Alan Schreck endorsed William’s educational Donum Veritatis - The Gift of Truth Ministries “as an effective and important means to spread the faith and to promote Christian unity… It really is a ‘gift’ to the ‘Internet Generation.’” He was invited three times to the ecumenical Springtime of Faith Rome Summits (Catholic and Evangelical Christian leaders meeting with Vatican Officials) for being considered “one of the dynamic leaders building the New Springtime of Faith.” He recently founded Human Rights and Freedoms Forever! and published DEMOCRACY 101 in response to accelerating attacks on human life and freedom throughout the West since 2015. Having taught a course in Logic, he reminds all those who would read his above Christian qualifications and be tempted to simply dismiss his books merely on that basis (instead of engaging with their powerful facts and logic with intellectual honesty), that to do so is to commit what the Science of Logic calls the “genetic fallacy” combined with circular reasoning, known as “Bulverism.” He says “No intellectually honest person can deny Western Human Rights and freedoms start with The Foundational Principles of Human Rights and Democracy identified herein, which Christianity introduced into the West, and only the intellectually dishonest would dismiss these books lightly and without engaging with their undisputed facts of science and history, and sound logic. But LASTING Democracy, religious freedom, and Human Rights for all require that in response to current ‘Creeping Totalitarianism’ these books start a DIALOGUE in Western nations about just how to ensure these highest of Western values last for the long-term.”<./p>